News

Chocolate relief in a troubled world: cocoa cools as Easter meets macro gloom

01 Apr 2026

Key Points:

  • Cocoa has fallen sharply from 2024–25 extremes, offering rare relief as broader markets struggle with war and inflation risks.
  • The price collapse reflects classic commodity dynamics: demand destruction, substitution, and improving supply expectations.
  • Retail chocolate prices will lag, but input cost pressure is easing after an unprecedented spike.
  • A 12-ton KitKat theft adds a surreal twist, highlighting ongoing supply chain fragility despite softer raw material prices

Easter arrives this year against a difficult global backdrop. The outbreak of and escalation of the conflict in the Middle East, has fuelled concerns about both growth and inflation. Higher energy prices - across crude, refined products, and gas - have fed directly into rising costs for fertilizers, transport, and industrial inputs, while also lifting food prices through second-round effects.

Financial markets have reflected this unease. The S&P 500 and Nasdaq are both down around 8% on the month, with the Mag 7 and Euro Stoxx 50 closer to a 10% decline, while core emerging markets have suffered a 12% setback after being the investment darlings in the first two months of the year. Against this backdrop, commodities linked to discretionary consumption rarely offer a positive narrative. This Easter, however, cocoa is proving an exception.

After a modest rebound of around 10% this month, cocoa prices remain dramatically below last year’s extreme highs. Currently trading near USD 3,100 per ton, the market is still above the long-term average of around USD 2,600 that prevailed prior to the 2024–25 spike, but it is down roughly 65% since last Easter when prices traded around USD 8,800. What was briefly one of the most disorderly bull markets across commodities has now undergone a rapid normalization.

The move lower underscores a fundamental principle: the best cure for high prices is high prices.

At the height of the rally, cocoa transitioned from a relatively stable agricultural commodity into a scarcity-driven market dominated by supply fears and speculative momentum. That environment triggered a predictable response across the value chain.

On the demand side, chocolate manufacturers moved quickly to protect margins. Product sizes were reduced, recipes were adjusted, and substitution became more widespread, particularly through increased use of non-cocoa ingredients. These measures may not have been immediately visible to consumers, but they contributed to a meaningful slowdown in cocoa demand growth.

At the same time, elevated prices began to reshape expectations on the supply side. While structural challenges in key producing regions remain, the extreme tightness seen during the 2023/24 season has started to ease. The market narrative has shifted from deficit to a more balanced, and potentially surplus, outlook as production stabilizes and demand softens.

The combination of weaker demand and improving supply expectations has removed the urgency that previously drove prices higher. In commodity markets, the absence of panic buying can be just as powerful as the presence of strong supply growth.

Importantly, the decline in futures prices does not translate immediately into cheaper chocolate at the retail level. Pricing across consumer products tends to adjust with a lag, reflecting hedging practices and inventory cycles. However, the direction of travel is clear: the intense cost pressure that defined the past two years is easing.

This makes cocoa something of an outlier in the current macro environment. While energy, metals, and agricultural markets more broadly are dealing with renewed upside risks linked to geopolitical disruption and higher input costs, cocoa is moving in the opposite direction, offering a rare pocket of relief.

Adding a layer of unintended irony to this year’s Easter narrative is a recent incident that borders on the surreal. A truck carrying 413,793 units - around 12 tons - of KitKat’s new Formula One-themed chocolate bars was stolen while in transit across Europe on 26 March. The shipment, linked to KitKat’s role as Formula One’s official chocolate partner, has yet to be recovered.

While unlikely to materially impact the broader market, the episode serves as a reminder that supply chains remain vulnerable, even in markets where underlying fundamentals are improving. It also highlights the enduring value of chocolate - both economically and culturally - at a time when broader sentiment remains fragile.

Taken together, the story of cocoa this Easter offers a useful contrast to the dominant macro narrative. In a world where rising energy costs, geopolitical risks, and financial market volatility continue to dominate headlines, one of the most familiar comfort goods has quietly become more affordable.

Chocolate will not change the direction of global markets, nor will it offset the broader challenges facing the economy. But after a period in which cocoa prices surged to unsustainable levels, the current retracement provides a timely reminder of how quickly commodity markets can rebalance.

For now, at least, Easter indulgence comes with a slightly lower price tag at the raw material level. In the current environment, that counts as a small but welcome positive.

Cocoa, first month cont. - Source: Saxo
Nestle SA - Source: Saxo
Ole HansenHead of Commodity StrategySaxo Bank
Topics: Commodities Inflation Iran Cocoa

What is the gold-crude ratio telling us?

25 Mar 2026
The Middle East war has pulled the gold-crude ratio sharply lower this month, and in order to understand the slump, it is useful to look back at 2020, when the ratio surged to record highs during the pandemic. That episode highlighted how strongly the ratio responds to large, asymmetric shocks in either demand or supply.
In 2020, the global economy experienced a severe demand shock. Energy consumption collapsed, sending crude prices sharply lower, while gold rallied as central banks cut rates aggressively and injected liquidity to stabilise growth. The ratio moved higher because oil weakened at the same time as gold strengthened.
The current environment is effectively the mirror image. What we are dealing with today is primarily a supply shock in energy markets, centred on the Middle East and disruptions to key export flows. This has driven a sharp increase in crude prices as physical markets tighten, particularly in refined products.
At the same time, gold which up until recently had enjoyed a record run of gains has come under pressure—not necessarily because its longer-term drivers have disappeared, but due to a shift in the macro backdrop. Higher energy prices are feeding into inflation expectations, which in turn are pushing bond yields higher and forcing markets to reassess the timing and extent of rate cuts. This tightening in financial conditions reduces the appeal of non-yielding assets such as gold in the short term.
In addition, there is a clear liquidity component. Following a prolonged rally, gold had become a crowded long. In periods of cross-asset stress, gold is often sold not because it is fundamentally weak, but because it is one of the most liquid assets investors can tap to meet margin calls or rebalance portfolios. This dynamic appears to have played an important role in the recent correction.
In other words, the two markets are responding to different drivers within the same macro shock. Oil is reacting to immediate supply constraints, while gold is adjusting to tighter liquidity, rising yields, and shifting policy expectations.
In short, the decline in the ratio is less about capital rotating between the two assets and more about a divergence driven by a supply-led energy shock colliding with a repricing of global monetary conditions. It is also worth recalling how quickly the gold-to-oil ratio reversed following the 2020 spike. Once the initial demand shock passed, oil prices began to recover as mobility and economic activity normalised, while gold extended its rally, supported by ultra-loose monetary policy, negative real yields, and continued uncertainty. As a result, the ratio, having surged to extreme levels, started to compress relatively quickly as both legs moved in opposite directions.
A similar dynamic could unfold following the current supply-driven spike, albeit through a different sequence. For the ratio to move higher again from current depressed levels, two relatively obvious conditions would likely need to be met.
First, crude prices would need to stabilise or moderate. This could occur if supply disruptions ease—either through a de-escalation in the Middle East, partial reopening of key export routes, or a demand response as elevated prices begin to weigh on consumption and growth.
Second, gold would need to regain support from the macro backdrop. This would likely require a shift in market expectations towards slower growth or financial stress, leading to lower bond yields and a renewed focus on rate cuts. In such a scenario, gold would benefit from both declining real yields and its role as a hedge against economic and financial instability.
The Comex Gold - ICE Brent Crude Ratio - Source: Bloomberg & Saxo
Ole HansenHead of Commodity StrategySaxo Bank
Topics: Macro Inflation Iran Gold Crude Oil

Trump: We are very close to meeting our objectives in Iran

21 Mar 2026

Here is the latest from Trump:

We are getting very close to meeting our objectives as we consider winding down our great Military efforts in the Middle East with respect to the Terrorist Regime of Iran: (1) Completely degrading Iranian Missile Capability, Launchers, and everything else pertaining to them. (2) Destroying Iran’s Defense Industrial Base. (3) Eliminating their Navy and Air Force, including Anti Aircraft Weaponry. (4) Never allowing Iran to get even close to Nuclear Capability, and always being in a position where the U.S.A. can quickly and powerfully react to such a situation, should it take place. (5) Protecting, at the highest level, our Middle Eastern Allies, including Israel, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, Kuwait, and others. The Hormuz Strait will have to be guarded and policed, as necessary, by other Nations who use it — The United States does not! If asked, we will help these Countries in their Hormuz efforts, but it shouldn’t be necessary once Iran’s threat is eradicated. Importantly, it will be an easy Military Operation for them. Thank you for your attention to this matter! President DONALD J. TRUMP

Notably, this came out after the market closed. In the past three weeks, he's escalated things immediately after the market closed. This time, he's de-escalating or at least indicating that he could leave.

What he's hinting at here is a strategy that many have speculated about, including us. He will simply declare 'mission accomplished' and leave the mess for everyone else to clean up.

He said the Strait will "need to be guarded and policed... by other nations who use it", ruling out the USA. He did say the US will help if asked but I imagine that would come at a high price. He also has pivoted from saying that securing the Strait will be easy for the US (this morning) to that it will be "easy ... for them".

Regardless of the politics, this post significantly diminishes the chance of a US land invasion or a protracted war. It sounds like Trump is planning to bail out and leave Iran's regime in place. Now we will have to wait to see what the plan is from Iran and Gulf countries. I can see Iran demanding that those countries close US bases.

In any case, there is a statement from Europe, Japan, Canada and Bahrain saying they're willing to join efforts for Hormuz safe passage.

This article was written by Adam Button at investinglive.com.