News

China industrial profits rise 21% in May but growth slows as domestic demand lags

29 Jun 2026

The sectoral split in China's profit data has direct commodity read-throughs: upstream outperformance in non-ferrous metals and electronics materials reflects sustained input cost pressure that has yet to fully resolve downstream, while the 19.8% drop in automaker profits despite strong export volumes signals that margin compression at the factory floor is acute. The Hormuz link is explicit in analyst commentary, with a gradual Strait reopening seen as the key catalyst for a downstream profit recovery, particularly in sectors that have been squeezed by elevated energy and shipping costs. Beijing's instruction to commercial banks to lift lending this month suggests policymakers are not waiting for external conditions to improve before acting, but weak credit demand points to a confidence problem that rate-sensitive tools alone are unlikely to fix. For base metals and energy markets, the trajectory of Chinese industrial activity through the second half will hinge substantially on whether the ceasefire holds and cost pressures at the upstream level begin transmitting more favourably to manufacturers.

---Weekend data - China's industrial profits rose 21.1% in May, slowing from April's 24.7%, with electronics soaring 103.9% on AI demand while automakers fell 19.8% amid weak domestic consumption.

Summary:

  • Industrial profits at major Chinese firms rose 21.1% year on year in May, easing from 24.7% growth in April, while the January-May cumulative figure reached 18.8%, slightly ahead of the 18.2% recorded in the first four months, according to China's National Bureau of Statistics
  • Profits among manufacturers of computers, communications and electronic equipment surged 103.9% in January-May, accounting for 43.1% of total industrial profit growth, driven by global AI investment demand, per NBS data
  • Specialised electronic materials producers within the semiconductor supply chain recorded profit growth of 665.4% in the period, according to NBS figures
  • The operating profit margin for major industrial firms reached 5.56% in January-May, its highest cumulative reading since 2024 and up 0.63 percentage points year on year, with an NBS statistician attributing the improvement to sustained falls in unit costs
  • Automakers saw profits fall 19.8% despite robust export volumes, while furniture manufacturers posted a 58.4% profit decline, reflecting intense domestic competition and weak consumer demand, per NBS data
  • Analysts at the Economist Intelligence Unit cited by Reuters said a gradual resumption of Strait of Hormuz shipping and lower oil prices would be key to recovering downstream profit margins, while Beijing has separately instructed some commercial banks to increase lending amid signs of weak credit demand

China's industrial firms posted double-digit profit growth for the fifth consecutive month in May, but the pace eased and the distribution of gains remained sharply uneven, with a technology sector supercharged by global artificial intelligence demand pulling further away from a domestic economy still weighed down by a prolonged property downturn and subdued consumer spending.

Profits at major industrial enterprises rose 21.1% year on year in May, according to data released by the National Bureau of Statistics on Saturday, moderating from the 24.7% growth recorded in April. For the January-May period, profits climbed 18.8% from a year earlier, a slight acceleration from the 18.2% expansion logged across the first four months. The operating profit margin for major firms edged up to 5.56% for the cumulative period, its highest reading since 2024, with the improvement attributed primarily to sustained falls in unit costs rather than any broad-based demand recovery.

The headline figures, however, mask a structural divide that analysts describe as the central contradiction in China's current economic position. Profits among manufacturers of computers, communications equipment and electronic products surged 103.9% in the January-May period, a gain so concentrated that it accounted for 43.1% of total industrial profit growth across all sectors. Within that supply chain, producers of specialised electronic materials recorded profit growth of 665.4%, a figure that reflects the extraordinary demand premium attached to AI-related hardware at every level of production.

Upstream sectors performed strongly in aggregate, with non-ferrous metal ore mining and processing profits rising 93.9%. An ANZ senior China strategist noted that price improvement, driven by upstream and technology sector dynamics, was the primary engine of corporate profit growth, while downstream manufacturing remained under pressure in line with producer price index trends.

The contrast at the bottom of the distribution is stark. Automakers saw profits fall 19.8% across the period despite maintaining robust export volumes, a result of intense domestic price competition and margin compression that export growth alone has been unable to offset. Furniture manufacturers fared worse, with profits dropping 58.4% as weak household spending and overcapacity combined to squeeze the sector.

The Iran conflict has added an external variable that cuts differently across the industrial spectrum. Elevated shipping costs and energy price pressure have weighed on downstream manufacturers most directly, and an Economist Intelligence Unit economist said explicitly that a gradual resumption of Strait of Hormuz traffic and lower oil prices would be the key catalyst for a downstream profit recovery. The ceasefire announced over the weekend introduces some prospect of that relief, though analysts remain cautious about the pace at which normalisation flows through to factory-floor margins.

Beijing is not waiting passively. The People's Bank of China has instructed some commercial banks to lift lending volumes this month, a targeted intervention aimed at shoring up corporate profitability and credit availability. The move is read as a response to persistently weak credit demand, a signal that confidence among businesses and consumers has not kept pace with the output numbers. Analysts broadly expect policymakers to continue rolling out targeted support measures, particularly in sectors grappling with overcapacity and cut-throat competition, as consolidation pressure intensifies across the industrial base.

This article was written by Eamonn Sheridan at investinglive.com.

UK media (Guardian) reports Starmer set to confirm autumn departure on Monday, UK time

22 Jun 2026

An orderly, autumn-dated exit would remove some of the acute uncertainty that has been pressuring sterling, since markets generally prefer a defined timetable over an open-ended leadership crisis. That said, the medium-term picture stays clouded given Burnham's more left-leaning fiscal instincts relative to Starmer, keeping a political risk premium embedded in gilts and GBP/USD until his policy direction becomes clearer. A clean handover with no contest would likely be read as the better outcome for sterling than a drawn-out leadership race, so confirmation of Streeting standing aside would be a relevant signal to watch alongside Monday's announcement.

Earlier:

  • Politics weigh on GBP: Starmer given until Tuesday to set exit date or face mass resigns

--- Starmer is expected to confirm an autumn exit timetable Monday, clearing the way for Burnham, as cabinet pressure and a Trump social media post add to the noise.

Summary: According to the Guardian, citing cabinet ministers and government sources:

  • Starmer is expected to announce a departure timetable Monday morning, with an autumn exit seen as most likely
  • More than half a dozen cabinet ministers have privately told him his time is up, ahead of a hostile Tuesday cabinet meeting
  • An autumn date would give Burnham time to build a team before Labour's late September conference
  • Wes Streeting says he still intends to stand, though some now expect him to step back
  • Donald Trump posted on social media appearing to confirm Starmer's resignation, criticising his record on immigration and energy

Keir Starmer is expected to confirm a timetable for his departure on Monday morning, with an autumn exit the most likely outcome, clearing the way for Andy Burnham to take over without a full leadership contest.

Cabinet pressure has been building, with more than half a dozen ministers said to have privately told Starmer his time is up, ahead of a hostile cabinet meeting expected Tuesday. An autumn handover would let Burnham assemble a team before Labour's late September conference, though it remains unclear whether he would face a contest. Wes Streeting maintains he intends to stand, though expectations are growing he may ultimately step back.

Adding to the noise, Donald Trump posted on social media appearing to pre-empt the announcement, criticising Starmer's record on immigration and energy policy.

For sterling, the key takeaway is that a defined exit date would reduce near-term uncertainty, even as the longer-term fiscal and policy implications of a Burnham government remain the bigger unknown for markets.

This article was written by Eamonn Sheridan at investinglive.com.

Iran military command says it's closing the Strait of Hormuz due to ceasefire violations

21 Jun 2026

Iran's Khatam-al Anbiya HQ announced that the Strait of Hormuz will be closed to all maritime traffic. The military headquarters cites US breaches of the war-ending deal and ongoing Israeli ceasefire violations, along with the non-withdrawal in Lebanon. They warned this is only the "first step." The Revolutionary Guard put out a similar statement yesterday.

There is an under-discussed risk that Iran wants to keep fighting. They have this tremendous leverage right now with Trump openly admitting that the oil situation would get very bad in four weeks. They may also sense that the US will never stay in the current deal as Trump is taking criticism from even his strongest supporters, so better to fight now than later. It's also looking like an opportunity to crack the US-Israel relationship, which would be a huge win for them.

On the other hand, it's tough to imagine Iran ever getting a better deal then the one they are getting now, so the politicians within Iran -- who also likely fear for their lives -- are trying to get them to take the deal.

Ultimately, though, there is a supposed ceasefire in Lebanon that is being endlessly broken by all sides and it's tough to imagine this deal will ever work because of that. Israel says it won't withdraw from Southern Lebanon and Iran's military command is insisting that's a pre-condition.

On the US side, Trump looks desperate to find a way out and Witkoff and Kushner are in Switzerland. VP Vance said he expects to go to Switzerland "in the next couple days" and says he's confident they can maintain a ceasefire.

For now, the question is whether Iran will try to enforce this latest 'closure' of the Strait of Hormuz via military means. WTI finished higher by nearly $1 on Friday despite the Israel-Lebanon ceasefire announcement.

Update: The Iran negotiating team is still going to Switzerland and a spokesman for them said: "Our focus is to demand accountability regarding other side's commitments & clarify exactly how they plan to fulfill them. If any part of their commitments is left unfulfilled, entire MoU will face problem."

This article was written by Adam Button at investinglive.com.

Choppy chips even as crude mega-dips. Warsh on tap.

18 Jun 2026
Crude oil moves getting less interest from other assets.

Listen to the full episode now or follow the Saxo Market Call on your favourite podcast app.

Links

  • Yesterday's podcast post, with more links, if you missed these.
  • Craig Tindale's latest on "Who owns the chemistry that turns metal into power." Laying out why those critical materials are so critical and the systematic changes required to address the issue if China isn't to maintain its dominance and leverage.
  • Peter Garnry on SpaceX and how truly rare  it is to see the kind of growth that some are anticipating for this company - with only two prior examples that are even in the same universe for a company of size.

Questions and comments, please!

We invite you to send any questions and comments you might have for the podcast team. Whether feedback on the show's content, questions about specific topics, or requests for more focus on a given market area in an upcoming podcast, please get in touch at [email protected].
This content is marketing material and should not be considered investment advice. Trading financial instruments carries risks and historic performance is not a guarantee for future performance. The instrument(s) mentioned in this content may be issued by a partner, from which Saxo receives promotion, payment or retrocessions. While Saxo receives compensation from these partnerships, all content is conducted with the intention of providing clients with valuable options and information.
Saxo Market Call
Saxo Bank
Topics: Podcast Highlighted articles Forex

Options Brief - Semis rebound, CPI looms - 9 June 2026

10 Jun 2026
Intel surged 11.2%, Micron 9.9%, and the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index 5.6% on Monday, a sharp rebound partly driven by Iran-Israel ceasefire progress. But here is what the options market is saying: despite the price recovery, the tape stayed defensive. VIX dropped to 18.92, yet the nine-day VIX9D at 19.69 still exceeds spot, pointing directly at Wednesday's CPI and the June FOMC.

Options Brief - Semis rebound, CPI looms - 9 June 2026

Headline driver

Iran-Israel ceasefire progress triggered a sharp semiconductor rebound on Monday, with Intel surging 11.2%, Micron up 9.9%, and the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index gaining 5.6%, partly reversing Friday's AI-driven selloff. See the Market Quick Take - 9 June 2026 for the full macro picture.

Market snapshot

  • S&P 500 closed at 7,405.73, up 0.3%; Nasdaq 100 closed at 29,414.26, up 1.6%; Dow Jones Industrial Average closed at 50,791.07, down 0.2%; Russell 2000 rose 0.8%
  • VIX closed at 18.92, down from 21.51 on Friday; short-dated VIX1D at 16.02; nine-day VIX9D at 19.69
  • Market regime: Neutral / Chop – VIX 18.3, 20-day realised vol 12.9% (increasing), S&P 500 +3.22% above its 50-day moving average
  • Semiconductors led the session; Apple fell 1.9% after its AI event underwhelmed; Wednesday's May CPI release is the next key market test

Options flow sentiment

Based on end-of-day 8 June – yesterday's positioning, not today's price action.

Single-name flow leaned bullish in AI and software heavyweights, with concentrated upside call demand across the sector, though a hedge layer in consumer tech names kept the overall read closer to selective risk-taking than outright conviction.

Index and ETF flow remained primarily defensive: broad put demand across equity index products, Treasury duration ETFs, and small caps pointed to investors maintaining protection ahead of Wednesday's CPI release and the June 16–17 FOMC meeting, even as deep-in-the-money equity calls and selected single-name upside softened the fully defensive read.

Options angle

VIX closed Monday at 18.92, down from 21.51 on Friday, with the very short-dated VIX1D falling sharply to 16.02. The nine-day VIX (VIX9D) at 19.69 now sits above spot VIX, indicating that the market is pricing its concern into the CPI-to-FOMC window over the next two weeks rather than the immediate session. Based on S&P 500 options pricing, the market is implying a weekly expected move of approximately 109 points, projecting a range of roughly 7,297 to 7,515 around Monday's close. Put options continue to command higher premiums than equivalent calls, consistent with the hedging demand that persisted even as prices recovered on Monday. Important note: The strategies and examples provided in this article are purely for educational purposes. They are intended to assist in shaping your thought process and should not be replicated or implemented without careful consideration. Every investor or trader must conduct their own due diligence and take into account their unique financial situation, risk tolerance, and investment objectives before making any decisions. Remember, investing in the stock market carries risk, and it's crucial to make informed decisions.

Strategy insight – Long strangle into the CPI window

With implied vol running at moderate levels and Wednesday's CPI release representing a genuine binary catalyst, a long strangle – buying an out-of-the-money call and an out-of-the-money put on the same underlying with the same expiry – positions for a larger-than-priced move in either direction without requiring a directional view. The structure costs less than an at-the-money straddle because both legs start out of the money, making it more appropriate when the catalyst is binary and the potential move may exceed the currently priced range. The maximum loss is the net premium paid for both legs if the underlying stays between the breakeven prices and the options expire worthless.

Strategy insight – Calendar spread to capture event vol decay

When a near-dated expiry captures a known catalyst such as a CPI release, front-month implied volatility often runs above the back-month level on the same strike, reflecting the event premium baked into the nearer option. A calendar spread sells the near-dated option and buys the same strike in the next expiry, collecting this volatility differential and achieving maximum profit when the underlying settles near the short strike once the event has passed. The structure requires less capital than an outright long position and benefits directly from the faster time decay of the front-month leg. The main risk is a large post-CPI move that pushes the underlying well beyond the short strike's breakeven range, collapsing the calendar's profit zone.

Conclusion

Heading into Tuesday, the options market is still wearing its seatbelt from last week: VIX above 18 with a term structure sloping upward into the CPI-FOMC window, put premiums elevated relative to calls, and Monday's options tape leaning defensive-first with only selective upside participation. Wednesday's CPI print is the next pivot point, and the vol surface's reaction to that data will tell traders more about June's direction than any individual session.

This content is marketing material and should not be regarded as investment advice. Trading financial instruments carries risks and historic performance is not a guarantee of future results. The Author is permitted to wait at least 24 hours from the time of the publication before they trade the instruments themselves. The instrument(s) referenced in this content may be issued by a partner, from whom Saxo receives promotional fees, payment or retrocessions. While Saxo may receive compensation from these partnerships, all content is created with the aim of providing clients with valuable information and options. This content will not be changed or subject to review after publication.
Related articles/content             
Options Brief - Options amplified Fridays sell-off - 8 June 2026 Options Brief - Broadcom shock rotation wins - 5 June 2026 Options Brief - Streak snaps payrolls loom - 4 June 2026 Options Brief - Chip surge new SP record - 3 June 2026 Options Brief - Tech records oil whipsaw - 2 June 2026 Options Brief - Snowflake and AI lift records - 29 May 2026 Options Brief - Iran oil swing Dow record - 28 May 2026 Options Brief - Nasdaq clears 30000 - 27 May 2026
More from the author             
  • Koen Hoorelbeke's articles on Saxo
  • Follow and interact with me on X (Twitter) for more intraday content
Koen HoorelbekeInvestment and Options StrategistSaxo Bank
Topics: Options Thought Starters Investing with options Highlighted articles Listed Options Income investor – Options What are your options Learn about options Options education Getting Started with Options En hurtig tanke

Options Brief - Options amplified Friday's selloff - 8 June 2026

09 Jun 2026
Friday’s S&P 500 fell 2.64%. But VIX surged almost 40% on the same session - and that gap tells you everything about what happened beneath the surface. In today’s Options Brief, I look at the dealer gamma mechanics that turned a bad payrolls print and a Broadcom disappointment into a selloff that went further than fundamentals warranted.

Options Brief - Options amplified Friday’s selloff - 8 June 2026

When dealer gamma mechanics turn a macro selloff into a cascade – and what that means for Monday.

Friday’s 2.64% S&P 500 decline and 39.68% VIX spike were driven by a real macro catalyst, but in our view the options market amplified the move well beyond what fundamentals alone would have produced. This edition examines the dealer gamma mechanics behind Friday’s session, the market structure indicators that flagged the overshoot, and what the institutional bifurcation in options flow may mean for Monday’s open.

Headline driver

May payrolls printed at 172,000 on Friday, more than double the 80,000 consensus, pushing Treasury yields sharply higher and reviving rate-hike fears. Broadcom’s failure to raise its AI chip outlook sent semiconductors sharply lower, erasing over $1 trillion in sector market value. The Monday setup carries an added complication: Iran launched ballistic missiles at Israel overnight Sunday, breaking a fragile ceasefire and sending oil more than 4% higher in Asian trading while South Korea’s KOSPI triggered a circuit breaker at -8.4%.

Market snapshot

The S&P 500 closed Friday at 7,383.74 (-2.64%), the Nasdaq 100 fell 4.77% to 28,957.60, and the Russell 2000 dropped 3.47%. The Dow Jones Industrial Average closed at 50,872 (-1.35%). The 10-year Treasury yield ended at 4.576%. Heading into Monday’s session, WTI crude is up 4.42% to $94.54 on the Iran escalation, while S&P 500 futures point to a 0.16% additional decline and Nasdaq 100 futures indicate a 0.10% further drop, a notable divergence from the KOSPI’s 8.4% circuit-breaker collapse.

Market regime: Neutral/Chop – VIX 21.51 (Friday close), 20-day realised vol 13.2% (increasing), S&P 500 +3.18% above its 50-day moving average.

Options flow sentiment

Based on end-of-day 5 June 2026 – yesterday’s positioning, not today’s price action.

Single-name confirmed-opening flow leaned selectively constructive in mega-cap technology, with upside structures in leading semiconductor names suggesting a portion of institutional money was positioning for recovery rather than bracing for further capitulation. Index and broad equity ETF put demand was heavy and clustered around upcoming inflation data and the June Federal Reserve meeting window, while cross-asset hedging in precious metals, credit, and energy reinforced a read of systematic portfolio risk reduction rather than outright directional selling.

Options angle – the dealer gamma dynamic

VIX closed Friday at 21.51, a 39.68% single-session spike. That kind of move does not emerge from news-driven selling alone. To understand why Friday was as severe as it was, the options market mechanics are worth examining in some detail.

When market participants buy puts at scale, the dealers who sell those contracts are left short gamma. As the underlying falls, their negative delta exposure grows, forcing them to sell futures or the underlying asset to stay hedged. That selling pushes the market lower, which triggers more hedging, which pushes it lower again. At sufficient scale, this feedback loop can significantly amplify a move that fundamental sellers alone would not have driven as far.

Friday’s flow data shows this dynamic at work. The most revealing figures are not the index closing levels but the relationship between single-session contract volume and prior open interest on key short-dated index ETF puts.

In one S&P 500 ETF expiry sitting directly on the date of Wednesday’s May CPI release, daily put volume reached more than 83,000 contracts against standing open interest of just 1,356. Since daily volume at that level can only be sustained if a substantial proportion of it represents new positions being opened, virtually all of that activity was fresh institutional demand. In short-dated Nasdaq 100 ETF puts capturing the Federal Reserve meeting window, volumes of roughly 37,000 and 33,000 contracts printed against prior open interest of 31,557 and 30,676 respectively. In the small-cap ETF, a single put cluster printed 66,647 contracts against prior open interest of 13,069.

These are not hedge rolls or adjustments to existing positions. They represent fresh put demand landing on dealers who had no choice but to immediately sell index futures to manage the resulting delta exposure. Into a session already soft on the jobs number and the Broadcom disappointment, that additional selling pressure compounded the move in a way that a purely macro-driven day would not have.

The timing amplified the effect further. The largest confirmed-opening blocks clustered in the final 45 minutes of the session. Dealers absorbing that put paper into the close, with no overnight hedging window and a full weekend of geopolitical uncertainty ahead, had to bid up implied volatility sharply while simultaneously selling delta. That is a significant reason why VIX rose 39.68% on a session where the S&P 500 itself moved 2.64%: the implied-volatility bid was partly a dealer response to their own inventory risk, not solely a fear signal from end investors. Fresh put demand can do more than signal investor fear. When dealers are left short gamma, their hedging activity can reinforce selling pressure, helping explain why volatility may rise faster than the underlying market falls. - Source: Saxo

Options angle – what the market structure indicators show

Three readings from Friday illustrate how structurally unusual the session was.

SKEW closed at 152.25, up 7.11% on the day. The CBOE SKEW index measures the relative cost of out-of-the-money downside protection versus at-the-money options. A normal reading sits in the 110–120 range; readings above 140 are materially elevated. At 152.25, the market was pricing severe left-tail risk at a level consistent with genuine institutional concern about a disorderly move, not routine end-of-week hedging.

VVIX, the volatility-of-volatility index, closed at 102.04, up 19% on the session. When VVIX trades above 100, options on the VIX itself are expensive, meaning the market is not only positioned defensively but is uncertain about how defensive it may need to become. A reading at this level reflects second-order fear: uncertainty about the uncertainty itself.

Three-month implied correlation (COR3M) rose 38.51% to 12.23. When implied correlation spikes, individual stocks are expected to move as a bloc rather than on their own fundamentals. That is the signature of a systematic risk-off event, not a sector-specific repricing. It confirms that dealers were pricing market-wide risk, not isolated weakness in semiconductors.

Put/call ratios across equity indices and single names spiked 20–30% during the session, with the equity put/call ratio reaching 0.841 and the index put/call ratio reaching 1.31. Historically, readings at these levels have been more frequently associated with short-term selling exhaustion than with the beginning of sustained downtrends, though they are sentiment indicators and require price confirmation before they carry any directional weight.

Options angle – the bifurcation

One aspect of Friday that the headline numbers do not capture is that the same session generating all of the above also saw substantial confirmed-opening upside call positioning in leading semiconductor names. Tens of thousands of call contracts opened in structured upside packages in NVDA and TSM, consistent with longer-dated recovery positioning by portfolio-level investors, not short-term speculation. Defensive-sector ETFs saw call demand alongside the broader market put activity.

Pure capitulation is one-directional. What Friday’s flow shows instead is institutional bifurcation: the risk management desk hedging aggressively into the weekend while the portfolio management desk was adding upside convexity at lower prices, the two running simultaneously.

In our view, that pattern is meaningful for the Monday question. A genuine fundamental re-rating of growth expectations, where investors are abandoning positions outright, does not produce this kind of two-sided institutional activity. A mechanically amplified selloff, where the initial catalyst is real but dealer gamma mechanics extend the move beyond where fundamentals alone would clear, more often does. Mechanically amplified selloffs have historically tended to overshoot the fundamental clearing level, though past patterns are not a reliable guide to future outcomes and this is not a prediction of a rebound.

That distinction carries some weight when interpreting the contrarian signals now present: the inverted VIX term structure, the put/call extremes, and front-month VIX futures sitting at 19.51, well below the spot VIX of 21.51. These are not buy signals. They are evidence that the options market’s own mechanics contributed materially to Friday’s severity, which in turn suggests the fundamental case for lower prices may have been overpriced during Friday’s close.

Conclusion

Friday’s selloff was driven by a real macro catalyst, but in our view the options market amplified the move well beyond what fundamentals alone would have produced. The dealer gamma dynamic, the late-session institutional put clustering, and the extreme readings in SKEW, VVIX, and implied correlation all point to a session that mechanically overshot. Whether that overshoot corrects today depends on two variables that were not present on Friday: the Iran geopolitical premium, which has added fresh risk, and the absence of fresh systematic put demand at the open, which would be the signal that the cascade is resuming rather than exhausted. Market outcomes are inherently uncertain and today’s first hour carries significant informational weight.

This content is marketing material and should not be regarded as investment advice. Trading financial instruments carries risks and historic performance is not a guarantee of future results. The Author is permitted to wait at least 24 hours from the time of the publication before they trade the instruments themselves. The instrument(s) referenced in this content may be issued by a partner, from whom Saxo receives promotional fees, payment or retrocessions. While Saxo may receive compensation from these partnerships, all content is created with the aim of providing clients with valuable information and options. This content will not be changed or subject to review after publication.
Related articles/content             
Options Brief - Broadcom shock rotation wins - 5 June 2026 Options Brief - Streak snaps payrolls loom - 4 June 2026 Options Brief - Chip surge new SP record - 3 June 2026 Options Brief - Tech records oil whipsaw - 2 June 2026 Options Brief - Snowflake and AI lift records - 29 May 2026 Options Brief - Iran oil swing Dow record - 28 May 2026 Options Brief - Nasdaq clears 30000 - 27 May 2026 Options Brief - Hormuz hopes douse oil - 26 May 2026
More from the author             
  • Koen Hoorelbeke's articles on Saxo
  • Follow and interact with me on X (Twitter) for more intraday content
Koen HoorelbekeInvestment and Options StrategistSaxo Bank
Topics: Options Thought Starters Investing with options Highlighted articles Listed Options Income investor – Options What are your options Learn about options Options education Getting Started with Options En hurtig tanke